Does review take as long as typing?
No. Reviewing a drafted row is faster than entering one, and the reviewer only concentrates on rows the checks flagged or that look wrong.
Last reviewed 2026-09-20. Fulla Ledger details below are properties of this service; check the alternative's own documentation for its current behavior.
Manual entry is accurate when the volume is small and the operator is careful. Fulla Ledger is faster at volume and keeps the audit trail that manual entry usually loses.
| Dimension | Fulla Ledger | Typing statement rows by hand |
|---|---|---|
| Speed at volume | Pages are drafted in parallel, then reviewed row by row. | Scales linearly with typing speed and fatigue. |
| Transcription errors | Draft rows carry a confidence score and failed checks force review rather than silent acceptance. | Typos are found later, if at all. |
| Reconciliation | Opening, running, and closing balances are checked, plus whole-statement balance equations. | Manual addition, verified by eye. |
| Audit trail | Review events, the approved revision, and the export are recorded together. | A spreadsheet with no history. |
| Cost | A page allowance or stored page credits, with no overage charges. | Reviewer time at their loaded rate, spent again on the next statement. |
No. Reviewing a drafted row is faster than entering one, and the reviewer only concentrates on rows the checks flagged or that look wrong.
Correct, split, merge, or undo the row before approval. Approval fixes the exact revision that exports and API results use.
No. A failed statement releases its reservation rather than consuming allowance or credits.
Upload one statement, review every row against its source page, and export the approved revision.
Convert a statement